Document Type
Book Review
Publication Date
2018
Keywords
Gun Control, Gendered Violence, Domestic Violence, Charter, Feminist Legal Theory
Abstract
In Gun Control and Women’s Rights in Context: Reflections of the Applicant on Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic v Canada, Amanda Dale not only provides the reader with an embodied account of law that exemplifies the limits of legal discourse, she also offers a compelling (and disheartening) explication of how and why the Stephen Harper government’s repeal of the long-gun registry threatens the lives of women.
As Dale points out, gun control in Canada is different from that in the United States. Canadian gun control laws are, of course, much more robust. For example, restricted weapons, such as handguns, have been subject to gun control legislation, including a registry, since 1932. However, a Canadian registry for long guns (shotguns and rifles) was not put into place until 1995 – following a mass shooting in Montreal that engendered significant activism aimed at reducing violence against women. The shooter targeted women and said he was motivated by a hatred of feminists. Noting that most women are shot by people they know and that most domestic violence involving firearms involves legally owned shotguns and rifles, Dale explains the connection between the protection of women’s physical safety and the need for a long-gun registry.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Elaine Craig, "Women and Guns", Book Review of Gun Control and Women's Rights in Context: Reflections of the Applicant on Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic v Canada by Amanda Dale, (2018) JOTWELL Equality.
