Pas de Deux: Deference and Non-Deference in Action
Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
2012
Keywords
Standards of Review, Judicial Deference, Canada, Dunsmuir v New Brunswick
Abstract
Chapter 9 introduced the complexities of the law on identifying the appropriate standard of review where an administrative decision is subject to judicial oversight. The present chapter revisits the law on the standards of review, shifting the focus from the application of the selected standard to the decision under review. It inquires, in particular, into the signposts that have been erected in and after Dunsmuir to direct the conduct of judicial review on a correctness or reasonableness standard, although it also asks what guidance may be drawn from the pre-Dunsmuir case law on these matters. The question driving this chapter's inquiry into the meaning and application of the standards of review is, therefore, "What is required of adminsitrative decision-makers in order to satisfy the expectations of substantive legality?"
Recommended Citation
Sheila Wildeman, "Pas de Deux: Deference and Non-Deference in Action" in Colleen Flood & Lorne Sossin, eds, Administrative Law in Context, 2nd ed (Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publishing, 2012) 323.
