Supreme Court of Canada, values, religion, liberty, freedom of religion
The Supreme Court of Canada has long pursued the view that our law is somehow an expression and repository of what it terms "Canada 's fundamental values." In Bruker v. Marcovitz, the Court added to the catalogue of these judicially decreed and enforced values one concerning religion, namely, the protection of Canadians against the arbitrary disadvantages of their religions. This comment argues that the Court's judgment in this regard constitutes a fundamental threat to religious liberty inasmuch as it subordinates religious beliefand practice to state values by making the legal acceptability of the former turn on their conformity to the latter.
F C. DeCoste, "Caesar's Faith: Limited Government and Freedom of Religion in Bruker v. Marcovitz" (2009) 32:1 Dal LJ 153.