International Law, Pollution, Global Environment, World of Sovereign States, criteria, sine qua non
A good book must have focus. This may not be the only criteria for evaluating a book, but it is certainly a sine qua non. A scholarly work such as Professor Springer's is a means of communicating ideas; the sharper its focus the clearer the message of its author and the better it and he communicates. When reading this book I wondered about its focus: was there a central unified objective? Having now completed the book, I can see that the author has painted us a useful, but blurred picture. He has not quite brought into focus his objective; much valuable information and many good ideas are obscured by the lack of a clear thesis. The book is not a repository or summing up of law; it does not provide reform or future-oriented suggestions; it does not argue for a particular point. What it does do is provide much interesting description on the theme of international pollution. But this is not the focus suggested by the author himself.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Bruce H. Wildsmith, “The International Law of Pollution: Protecting the Global Environment in a World of Sovereign States”, Book Review of The International Law of Pollution: Protecting the Global Environment in a World of Sovereign States by Allen L. Springer, (1984) 8:2 DLJ 549.